Aficamten for Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: One of the major determinants of exercise intolerance and limiting symptoms among patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is an elevated intracardiac pressure resulting from left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Aficamten is an oral selective cardiac myosin inhibitor that reduces left ventricular outflow tract gradients by mitigating cardiac hypercontractility. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned adults with symptomatic obstructive HCM to receive aficamten (starting dose, 5 mg; maximum dose, 20 mg) or placebo for 24 weeks, with dose adjustment based on echocardiography results. The primary end point was the change from baseline to week 24 in the peak oxygen uptake as assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The 10 prespecified secondary end points (tested hierarchically) were change in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score (KCCQ-CSS), improvement in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, change in the pressure gradient after the Valsalva maneuver, occurrence of a gradient of less than 30 mm Hg after the Valsalva maneuver, and duration of eligibility for septal reduction therapy (all assessed at week 24); change in the KCCQ-CSS, improvement in the NYHA functional class, change in the pressure gradient after the Valsalva maneuver, and occurrence of a gradient of less than 30 mm Hg after the Valsalva maneuver (all assessed at week 12); and change in the total workload as assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing at week 24. RESULTS: A total of 282 patients underwent randomization: 142 to the aficamten group and 140 to the placebo group. The mean age was 59.1 years, 59.2% were men, the baseline mean resting left ventricular outflow tract gradient was 55.1 mm Hg, and the baseline mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 74.8%. At 24 weeks, the mean change in the peak oxygen uptake was 1.8 ml per kilogram per minute (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 2.3) in the aficamten group and 0.0 ml per kilogram per minute (95% CI, -0.5 to 0.5) in the placebo group (least-squares mean between-group difference, 1.7 ml per kilogram per minute; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.4; P<0.001). The results for all 10 secondary end points were significantly improved with aficamten as compared with placebo. The incidence of adverse events appeared to be similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with symptomatic obstructive HCM, treatment with aficamten resulted in a significantly greater improvement in peak oxygen uptake than placebo. (Funded by Cytokinetics; SEQUOIA-HCM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05186818.).

Exercise Capacity in Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: SEQUOIA-HCM Baseline Characteristics and Study Design.

Patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) have increased risk of arrhythmia, stroke, heart failure, and sudden death. Contemporary management of oHCM has decreased annual hospitalization and mortality rates, yet patients have worsening health-related quality of life due to impaired exercise capacity and persistent residual symptoms. Here we consider the design of clinical trials evaluating potential oHCM therapies in the context of SEQUOIA-HCM (Safety, Efficacy, and Quantitative Understanding of Obstruction Impact of Aficamten in HCM). This large, phase 3 trial is now fully enrolled (N = 282). Baseline characteristics reflect an ethnically diverse population with characteristics typical of patients encountered clinically with substantial functional and symptom burden. The study will assess the effect of aficamten vs placebo, in addition to standard-of-care medications, on functional capacity and symptoms over 24 weeks. Future clinical trials could model the approach in SEQUOIA-HCM to evaluate the effect of potential therapies on the burden of oHCM. (Safety, Efficacy, and Quantitative Understanding of Obstruction Impact of Aficamten in HCM [SEQUOIA-HCM]; NCT05186818).

Noninvasive evaluation of pulmonary artery stiffness in heart failure patients via cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Heart failure (HF) presents manifestations in both cardiac and vascular abnormalities. Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is prevalent in up 50% of HF patients. While pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is closely associated with pulmonary artery (PA) stiffness, the association of HF caused, post-capillary PH and PA stiffness is unknown. We aimed to assess and compare PA stiffness and blood flow hemodynamics noninvasively across HF entities and control subjects without HF using CMR. We analyzed data of a prospectively conducted study with 74 adults, including 55 patients with HF across the spectrum (20 HF with preserved ejection fraction [HFpEF], 18 HF with mildly-reduced ejection fraction [HFmrEF] and 17 HF with reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF]) as well as 19 control subjects without HF. PA stiffness was defined as reduced vascular compliance, indicated primarily by the relative area change (RAC), altered flow hemodynamics were detected by increased flow velocities, mainly by pulse wave velocity (PWV). Correlations between the variables were explored using correlation and linear regression analysis. PA stiffness was significantly increased in HF patients compared to controls (RAC 30.92 ± 8.47 vs. 50.08 ± 9.08%, p < 0.001). PA blood flow parameters were significantly altered in HF patients (PWV 3.03 ± 0.53 vs. 2.11 ± 0.48, p < 0.001). These results were consistent in all three HF groups (HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF) compared to the control group. Furthermore, PA stiffness was associated with higher NT-proBNP levels and a reduced functional status. PA stiffness can be assessed non-invasively by CMR. PA stiffness is increased in HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF patients when compared to control subjects.Trial registration The study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS, registration number: DRKS00015615).

Depression, anxiety, and quality of life as predictors of rehospitalization in patients with chronic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a severe condition, often co-occurring with depression and anxiety, that strongly affects the quality of life (QoL) in some patients. Conversely, depressive and anxiety symptoms are associated with a 2-3 fold increase in mortality risk and were shown to act independently of typical risk factors in CHF progression. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of depression, anxiety, and QoL on the occurrence of rehospitalization within one year after discharge in CHF patients. METHODS: 148 CHF patients were enrolled in a 10-center, prospective, observational study. All patients completed two questionnaires, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Questionnaire Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) at discharge timepoint. RESULTS: It was found that demographic and clinical characteristics are not associated with rehospitalization. Still, the levels of depression correlated with gender (p ≤ 0.027) and marital status (p ≤ 0.001), while the anxiety values ​​were dependent on the occurrence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, levels of depression (HADS-Depression) and anxiety (HADS-Anxiety) did not correlate with the risk of rehospitalization. Univariate logistic regression analysis results showed that rehospitalized patients had significantly lower levels of Bodily pain (BP, p = 0.014), Vitality (VT, p = 0.005), Social Functioning (SF, p = 0.007), and General Health (GH, p = 0.002). In the multivariate model, poor GH (OR 0.966, p = 0.005) remained a significant risk factor for rehospitalization, and poor General Health is singled out as the most reliable prognostic parameter for rehospitalization (AUC = 0.665, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Taken together, our results suggest that QoL assessment complements clinical prognostic markers to identify CHF patients at high risk for adverse events. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered under http://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01501981, first posted on 30/12/2011), sponsored by Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin.

Rationale and design of the Biventricular Evaluation of Gliflozins effects In chroNic Heart Failure: BEGIN-HF study.

AIMS: Sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) represent a unique class of anti-hyperglycaemic agents for type 2 diabetes mellitus that selectively inhibit renal glucose reabsorption, thereby increasing urinary excretion of glucose. Several studies have demonstrated the cardioprotective effects of SGLT-2i in patients with heart failure (HF), unrelated to its glucosuric effect. It is unclear whether the benefits of SGLT-2i therapy also rely on the improvement of left ventricular (LV) and/or right ventricular (RV) function in patients with HF. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of SGLT-2i on LV and RV function through conventional and advanced echocardiographic parameters with a special focus on RV function in patients with HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Biventricular Evaluation of Gliflozins effects In chroNic Heart Failure (BEGIN-HF) study is an international multicentre, prospective study that will evaluate the effect of SGLT-2i on echocardiographic parameters of myocardial function in patients with chronic stable HF across the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) spectrum. Patients with New York Heart Association Class II/III symptoms, estimated glomerular filtration rate > 25 mL/min/1.73 m2 , age > 18 years, and those who were not previously treated with SGLT-2i will be included. All patients will undergo conventional, tissue-derived imaging (TDI), and strain echocardiography in an ambulatory setting, at time of enrolment and after 6 months of SGLT-2i therapy. The primary endpoint is the change in LV function as assessed by conventional, TDI, and myocardial deformation speckle tracking parameters. Secondary outcomes include changes in RV and left atrial function as assessed by conventional and deformation speckle tracking echocardiography. Univariate and multivariate analyses will be performed to identify predictors associated with primary and secondary endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: The BEGIN-HF will determine whether SGLT-2i therapy improves LV and/or RV function by conventional and advanced echocardiography in patients with HF irrespective of LVEF.

Vericiguat: A Randomized, Phase Ib, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, QTc Interval Study in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Vericiguat is indicated for the treatment of symptomatic chronic heart failure in adult patients with reduced ejection fraction who are stabilized after a recent decompensation event. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of vericiguat on QT interval in patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS). METHODS: This was a randomized, phase Ib, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study. Vericiguat once daily was up-titrated from 2.5 mg to 5 mg and then to 10 mg (treatments A, B, and C) at 14-day intervals. Positive control was moxifloxacin 400 mg (single dose on day 8 or day 50; placebo on other days [treatment D]). We evaluated the placebo-adjusted change from baseline of the Frederica-corrected QTc interval (QTcF), pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of vericiguat. RESULTS: In total, 74 patients with CCS, with mean (standard deviation) age 63.4 (8.0) years, were included and 72 patients completed the study. At each timepoint up to 7 h after administration, mean placebo-corrected change in QTcF from baseline was < 6 ms and the upper limit of the two-sided 90% confidence interval of the mean was below the 10-ms threshold for clinical relevance. Moxifloxacin confirmed the assay sensitivity. Median time of maximum concentration of vericiguat was 4.5 h post-dose. The adverse event profile of vericiguat was consistent with its mechanism of action, and the findings did not indicate any safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS: As part of an integrative risk assessment, this study demonstrated no clinically relevant corrected QT prolongation with vericiguat 10 mg once daily at steady state. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03504982.

Vericiguat is approved for treating worsening heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. As part of the safety evaluation of vericiguat, this study assessed its effect on the QT interval of the electrocardiogram. An electrocardiogram measures electrical activity of the heart. The QT interval is the time from the start of the Q wave to the end of the T wave. A longer than normal QT interval indicates an increased chance for abnormal heart rhythms. Usually, a QT study is conducted at high doses in healthy volunteers. Previous studies indicated that high doses of vericiguat may cause increased changes in blood pressure in healthy volunteers. Therefore, this study was performed in patients at a normal therapeutic dose. Patients with chronic coronary syndromes were enrolled rather than patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, because they have fewer electrocardiogram abnormalities. The starting dose of vericiguat was 2.5 mg once daily, and the dose was increased to 5 mg and then to 10 mg at 14-day intervals. Placebo was tested for comparison and moxifloxacin (400 mg), a drug known to increase the QT interval, was tested to confirm that the study could detect a change in the QT interval. An increase in the QT interval of more than 10 ms was considered clinically relevant. Of 74 patients included, 72 completed the study. At each timepoint (up to 7 h after dosing), the difference between the QT change for vericiguat and placebo was less than 10 ms; therefore, vericiguat does not prolong the QT interval to a clinically relevant extent.

Glucose-Induced Hemodynamic and Metabolic Response of Skeletal Muscle in Heart Failure Patients with Reduced vs. Preserved Ejection Fraction-A Pilot Study.

(1) Background: Insulin resistance (IR) is a characteristic pathophysiologic feature in heart failure (HF). We tested the hypothesis that skeletal muscle metabolism is differently impaired in patients with reduced (HFrEF) vs. preserved (HFpEF) ejection fraction. (2) Methods: carbohydrate and lipid metabolism was studied in situ by intramuscular microdialysis in patients with HFrEF (59 ± 14y, NYHA I-III) and HFpEF (65 ± 10y, NYHA I-II) vs. healthy subjects of similar age during the oral glucose load (oGL); (3) Results: There were no difference in fasting serum and interstitial parameters between the groups. Blood and dialysate glucose increased significantly in HFpEF vs. HFrEF and controls upon oGT (both p < 0.0001), while insulin increased significantly in HFrEF vs. HFpEF and controls (p < 0.0005). Muscle tissue perfusion tended to be lower in HFrEF vs. HFpEF and controls after the oGL (p = 0.057). There were no differences in postprandial increases in dialysate lactate and pyruvate. Postprandial dialysate glycerol was higher in HFpEF vs. HFrEF and controls upon oGL (p = 0.0016); (4) Conclusion: A pattern of muscle glucose metabolism is distinctly different in patients with HFrEF vs. HFpEF. While postprandial IR was characterized by impaired tissue perfusion and higher compensatory insulin secretion in HFrEF, reduced muscle glucose uptake and a blunted antilipolytic effect of insulin were found in HFpEF.

Vericiguat in combination with isosorbide mononitrate in patients with chronic coronary syndromes: The randomized, phase Ib, VISOR study.

Vericiguat was developed for the treatment of symptomatic chronic heart failure (HF) in adult patients with reduced ejection fraction who are stabilized after a recent decompensation event. Guidelines recommend long-acting nitrates, such as isosorbide mononitrate, for angina prophylaxis in chronic coronary syndromes (CCS), common comorbidities in HF. This study evaluated safety, tolerability, and the pharmacodynamic (PD) interaction between co-administered vericiguat and isosorbide mononitrate in patients with CCS. In this phase Ib, double-blind, multicenter study, patients were randomized 2:1 to receive vericiguat plus isosorbide mononitrate (n = 28) or placebo plus isosorbide mononitrate (n = 13). Isosorbide mononitrate was uptitrated to a stable dose of 60 mg once daily, followed by co-administration with vericiguat (uptitrated every 2 weeks from 2.5 mg to 5 mg and 10 mg) or placebo. Thirty-five patients completed treatment (vericiguat, n = 23; placebo, n = 12). Mean baseline- and placebo-adjusted vital signs showed reductions of 1.4-5.1 mmHg (systolic blood pressure) and 0.4-2.9 mmHg (diastolic blood pressure) and increases of 0.0-1.8 beats per minute (heart rate) with vericiguat plus isosorbide mononitrate. No consistent vericiguat dose-dependent PD effects were noted. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 92.3% and 66.7% in the vericiguat and placebo groups, respectively, and most were mild in intensity. Blood pressure and heart rate changes observed with vericiguat plus isosorbide mononitrate were not considered clinically relevant. This combination was generally well-tolerated. Concomitant use of vericiguat with isosorbide mononitrate is unlikely to cause significant AEs beyond those known for isosorbide mononitrate.

Vericiguat in Combination with Short-Acting Nitroglycerin in Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndromes: The Randomized, Phase Ib, VENICE Study.

Vericiguat is a soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator indicated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death and heart failure (HF) hospitalization in adults with symptomatic chronic HF and ejection fraction less than 45%. Guidelines recommend short-acting nitrates, such as sublingual nitroglycerin, for the treatment of acute angina pectoris in patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCSs), common comorbidities in HF. We evaluated safety, tolerability, and the pharmacodynamic interaction between vericiguat and nitroglycerin, coadministered in patients with CCSs. In this phase Ib, double-blind, randomized, multicenter study, 36 patients with CCSs received either vericiguat 2.5 mg (up-titrated every 2 weeks to 5 mg and 10 mg) or placebo. Patients also received nitroglycerin (0.4 mg sublingual). In total, 31 patients completed the study (vericiguat + nitroglycerin, n = 21; placebo + nitroglycerin, n = 10). There was no increase in treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with vericiguat + nitroglycerin vs. placebo + nitroglycerin; three patients discontinued due to TEAEs (vericiguat + nitroglycerin, n = 1; placebo + nitroglycerin, n = 2). Decreases in mean blood pressure (BP; 6-10 mmHg systolic BP (SBP); 4-6 mmHg diastolic BP (DBP)) were independent of vericiguat exposure and occurred to a similar extent at trough and peak concentrations with all vericiguat doses and placebo. Coadministration of vericiguat with nitroglycerin in patients with CCSs was well tolerated, and the combination is unlikely to cause significant adverse effects beyond those known for nitroglycerin.

Effects of sacubitril/valsartan versus valsartan on renal function in patients with and without diabetes and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: insights from PARAGON-HF.

AIMS: Diabetes is associated with a faster rate of renal function decline in patients with heart failure (HF). Sacubitril/valsartan attenuates the deterioration of renal function to a greater extent in patients with diabetes and HF with reduced ejection fraction compared with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors alone. We assessed whether the same may be true in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: In the PARAGON-HF trial in patients with HF and left ventricular ejection fraction of ≥45% (n = 4796), we characterized the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over a period of 192 weeks, and on the pre-specified renal composite outcome (eGFR reduction of ≥50%, end-stage renal disease, or death attributable to renal causes) in patients with (n = 2388) and without diabetes (n = 2408). The decline in eGFR was greater in patients with diabetes than in those without (-2.6 vs. -1.7 ml/min/1.73 m2 per year, p < 0.001), regardless of treatment assignment. Sacubitril/valsartan attenuated decline in eGFR similarly in patients with (-2.2 vs. -2.9 ml/min/1.73 m2 per year, p = 0.001) and without diabetes (-1.5 vs. -2.0 ml/min/1.73 m2 per year, p = 0.006) (pinteraction for difference in eGFR slopes = 0.40). Compared with valsartan, sacubitril/valsartan reduced the renal composite outcome similarly in patients without diabetes (hazard ratio [HR] 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-0.91) and those with diabetes (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33-0.89; pinteraction  = 0.59), as well as across a range of baseline glycated haemoglobin (pinteraction  = 0.71). CONCLUSION: Sacubitril/valsartan, compared with valsartan, attenuates the decline of eGFR and reduces clinically relevant kidney events similarly among patients with HFpEF with and without diabetes.

Paradigm shift in heart failure treatment: are cardiologists ready to use gliflozins?

Despite recent advances in chronic heart failure (HF) therapy, the prognosis of HF patients remains poor, with high rates of HF rehospitalizations and death in the early months after discharge. This emphasizes the need for incorporating novel HF drugs, beyond the current approach (that of modulating the neurohumoral response). Recently, new antidiabetic oral medications (sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i)) have been shown to improve prognosis in diabetic patients with previous cardiovascular (CV) events or high CV risk profile. Data from DAPA-HF study showed that dapaglifozin is associated with a significant reduction in mortality and HF hospitalization as compared with placebo regardless of diabetes status. Recently, results from EMPEROR-Reduced HF trial were consistent with DAPA-HF trial findings, showing significant beneficial effect associated with empagliflozin use in a high-risk HF population with markedly reduced ejection fraction. Results from the HF with preserved ejection fraction trials using these same agents are eagerly awaited. This review summarizes the evidence for the use of gliflozins in HF treatment.

Therapeutic responsiveness to vagus nerve stimulation in patients receiving beta-blockade for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: The effect of beta-blockade (BB) on response to vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has not been reported in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). In the ANTHEM-HF Study, 60 patients received chronic cervical VNS. Background pharmacological therapy remained unchanged during the study, and VNS intensity was stable once up-titrated. Significant improvement from baseline occurred in resting 24-hour heart rate (HR), 24-hour HR variability (SDNN), left ventricular EF (LVEF), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), and quality of life (MLWHFS) at 6 months post-titration. We evaluated whether response to VNS was related to percentage of target BB dose (PTBBD) at baseline. METHODS: Patients were categorized by baseline PTBBD, then analyzed for changes from baseline in symptoms and function at 6 months after VNS titration. RESULTS: All patients received BB, either PTBBD ≥ 50 % (16 patients, 27 %; group 1) or PTBBD < 50 % (44 patients, 73 %; group 2). Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, LVEF, use of ACE/ARB, and use of MRA were similar between the two groups at baseline. Six months after up-titration, VNS reduced HR and significantly improved SDNN, LVEF, 6MWD, and MLWHFS equally in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the ANTHEM-HF study, VNS responsiveness appeared to be independent of the baseline BB dose administered.

Sacubitril-valsartan as a treatment for apparent resistant hypertension in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.

AIMS: Patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) frequently have difficult-to-control hypertension. We examined the effect of neprilysin inhibition on 'apparent resistant hypertension' in patients with HFpEF in the PARAGON-HF trial, which compared the effect of sacubitril-valsartan with valsartan. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this post hoc analysis, patients were categorized according to systolic blood pressure at the end of the valsartan run-in (n = 4795). 'Apparent resistant hypertension' was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg (≥135 mmHg if diabetes) despite treatment with valsartan, a calcium channel blocker, and a diuretic. 'Apparent mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA)-resistant' hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg (≥135 mmHg if diabetes) despite the above treatments and an MRA. The primary outcome in the PARAGON-HF trial was a composite of total hospitalizations for heart failure and death from cardiovascular causes. We examined clinical endpoints and the safety of sacubitril-valsartan according to the hypertension category. We also examined reductions in blood pressure from the end of valsartan run-in to Weeks 4 and 16 after randomization. Overall, 731 patients (15.2%) had apparent resistant hypertension and 135 (2.8%) had apparent MRA-resistant hypertension. The rate of the primary outcome was higher in patients with apparent resistant hypertension [17.3; 95% confidence interval (CI) 15.6-19.1 per 100 person-years] compared to those with a controlled systolic blood pressure (13.4; 12.7-14.3 per 100 person-years), with an adjusted rate ratio of 1.28 (95% CI 1.05-1.57). The reduction in systolic blood pressure at Weeks 4 and 16, respectively, was greater with sacubitril-valsartan vs. valsartan in patients with apparent resistant hypertension [-4.8 (-7.0 to -2.5) and 3.9 (-6.6 to -1.3) mmHg] and apparent MRA-resistant hypertension [-8.8 (-14.0 to -3.5) and -6.3 (-12.5 to -0.1) mmHg]. The proportion of patients with apparent resistant hypertension achieving a controlled systolic blood pressure by Week 16 was 47.9% in the sacubitril-valsartan group and 34.3% in the valsartan group [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.78, 95% CI 1.30-2.43]. In patients with apparent MRA-resistant hypertension, the respective proportions were 43.6% vs. 28.4% (adjusted OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.18-5.89). CONCLUSION: Sacubitril-valsartan may be useful in treating apparent resistant hypertension in patients with HFpEF, even in those who continue to have an elevated blood pressure despite treatment with at least four antihypertensive drug classes, including an MRA. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: PARAGON-HF: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01920711.

Performance of a cardiac lipid panel compared to four prognostic scores in chronic heart failure.

The cardiac lipid panel (CLP) is a novel panel of metabolomic biomarkers that has previously shown to improve the diagnostic and prognostic value for CHF patients. Several prognostic scores have been developed for cardiovascular disease risk, but their use is limited to specific populations and precision is still inadequate. We compared a risk score using the CLP plus NT-proBNP to four commonly used risk scores: The Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM), Framingham risk score (FRS), Barcelona bio-HF (BCN Bio-HF) and Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) score. We included 280 elderly CHF patients from the Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study in Elderly trial. Cox Regression and hierarchical cluster analysis was performed. Integrated area under the curves (IAUC) was used as criterium for comparison. The mean (SD) follow-up period was 81 (33) months, and 95 (34%) subjects met the primary endpoint. The IAUC for FRS was 0.53, SHFM 0.61, BCN Bio-HF 0.72, MAGGIC 0.68, and CLP 0.78. Subjects were partitioned into three risk clusters: low, moderate, high with the CLP score showing the best ability to group patients into their respective risk cluster. A risk score composed of a novel panel of metabolite biomarkers plus NT-proBNP outperformed other common prognostic scores in predicting 10-year cardiovascular death in elderly ambulatory CHF patients. This approach could improve the clinical risk assessment of CHF patients.

The diagnostic and prognostic value of galectin-3 in patients at risk for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: results from the DIAST-CHF study.

AIMS: Galectin-3 (Gal-3) predicts long-term outcome among patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The ability of Gal-3 to diagnose and predict incident HFpEF in a cohort at risk for HFpEF is of particular interest. We aimed to determine the association between Gal-3 and clinical manifestations of HFpEF, the relationship between Gal-3 and all-cause mortality, or the composite of cardiovascular hospitalization and death. METHODS AND RESULTS: The observational Diast-CHF study included patients aged 50 to 85 years with ≥1 risk factor for HF (e.g. hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and atherosclerotic disease) or previously suspected HF. Patients were followed for 10 years. The association between Gal-3, evidence of diastolic dysfunction, and Framingham criteria for HF was examined. All deaths and hospitalizations were adjudicated as cardiovascular or non-cardiovascular. The analysis population was composed of 1386 subjects (67 years old, 50.9% female). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to diagnose HFpEF was 0.71. At a cut-off value of 13.57 ng/mL, sensitivity was 0.61 and specificity was 0.73 for Gal-3, and the diagnostic power to detect HFpEF was superior to N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.59, P > 0.001). Baseline Gal-3 was associated with risk factors for HF (P < 0.001). Higher levels of Gal-3 predicted incident HFpEF (P < 0.05), adjusted all-cause mortality (P < 0.001), and the adjusted composite of cardiovascular hospitalization and death (P < 0.001), both independent from N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide. CONCLUSIONS: Gal-3 differentiated patients with HFpEF from an overall cohort of well-characterized patients with risk factors for HFpEF. Independent of other factors, baseline Gal-3 levels were associated with a higher risk for incident HFpEF, mortality, or the composite of cardiovascular hospitalization and death over 10 year follow-up. In conjunction with clinical parameters, Gal-3 adds a statistically significant value for the diagnosis of HFpEF within this study, yet the clinical relevance remains debatable.

Left ventricular mechanics in patients with hematological malignancies before initiation of chemo- and radiotherapy.

Objective We sought to investigate left ventricular (LV) structure, function and mechanics in the patients with leukemia and lymphoma before initiation of chemotherapy, as well as the relationship between hematological malignancies and reduced LV longitudinal strain. Methods This retrospective investigation included 71 patients with leukemia and lymphoma before chemotherapy and 36 healthy controls. All participants underwent echocardiographic examination before initiation of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Results LV global longitudinal strain (- 20.2 ± 1.7% vs. - 17.9 ± 3.0%, p < 0.001) was significantly lower in the patients with hematological malignancies than in controls. There was no difference in LV circumferential and radial strains between two observed groups. Subendocardial and subepicardial longitudinal strains were significantly lower in the patients with hematological malignancies (- 20.5 ± 3.6% vs. - 22.5 ± 3.8%, p = 0.001 for subendocardial strain; - 18.0 ± 1.5% vs. - 15.8 ± 2.6%, p < 0.001 for subepicardial strain). Hematological malignancies were associated with reduced global LV longitudinal strain (OR 21.0; 95%CI 2.04-215.0, p = 0.010) independently of age, gender, heart rate, body mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular mass index, and glucose level. Conclusions LV longitudinal strain was impaired in the patients with leukemia and lymphoma even before initiation of chemotherapy. Endocardial and epicardial LV layers are equally affected in the patients with hematological malignancies. Newly diagnosed hematological malignancies were related with reduced LV global longitudinal strain independently of common clinical and echocardiographic parameters.

Aptamer BC 007 - Efficient binder of spreading-crucial SARS-CoV-2 proteins.

Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a respiratory disease caused by a new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) which causes significant morbidity and mortality. The emergence of this novel and highly pathogenic SARS-CoV-2 and its rapid international spread poses a serious global public health emergency. To date 32,174,627 cases, of which 962,613 (2.99%) have died, have been reported (https://www.who.int/westernpacific/health-topics/coronavirus, accessed 23 Sep 2020). The outbreak was declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern on 30 January 2020. There are still not many SARS-CoV-2-specific and effective treatments or vaccines available. A second round of infection is obviously unavoidable. Aptamers had already been at the centre of interest in the fight against viruses before now. The selection and development of a new aptamer is, however, a time-consuming process. We therefore checked whether a clinically developed aptamer, BC 007, which is currently in phase 2 of clinical testing for a different indication, would also be able to efficiently bind DNA-susceptible peptide structures from SARS-CoV-2-spreading crucial proteins, such as the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein and the RNA dependent RNA polymerase of SARS-CoV-2 (re-purposing). Indeed, several such sequence-sections have been identified. In particular for two of these sequences, BC 007 showed specific binding in a therapy-relevant concentration range, as shown in Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)- and Circular dicroism (CD)-spectroscopy and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). The excellent clinical toxicity and tolerability profile of this substance opens up an opportunity for rapid clinical testing of its COVID-19 effectiveness.

Real-Life Multimarker Monitoring in Patients with Heart Failure: Continuous Remote Monitoring of Mobility and Patient-Reported Outcomes as Digital End Points in Future Heart-Failure Trials.

AIMS: Heart failure (HF) affects approximately 26 million people worldwide. With an aging global population, innovative approaches to HF evaluation and management are needed to cope with the worsening HF epidemic. The aim of the Real-Life Multimarker Monitoring in Patients with Heart Failure (REALIsM-HF) study (NCT03507439) is to evaluate a composite instrument comprising remote, real-time, activity-monitoring devices combined with daily electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) items in patients who have been hospitalized for HF and are undergoing standard HF assessment (e.g., 6-min walking distance [6MWD], blood biomarkers, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire [KCCQ], and echocardiography). METHODS: REALIsM-HF is an ongoing, 12-week, observational study enrolling 80-100 patients aged ≥45 years with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥45%) or reduced EF (HFrEF; EF ≤35%). Statistical analyses will include examining the association between data from wearables (the AVIVO© mobile patient management patch or VitalPatch© biosensor, and the DynaPort MoveMonitor©), daily ePROs, and conventional HF metrics (e.g., serum/plasma biomarkers, 6MWD, KCCQ, and echocardiographic parameters). The feasibility of and patient compliance with at-home devices will be documented, and the data captured for the purpose of establishing reference values in patients with HFpEF or HFrEF will be summarized. CONCLUSIONS: The REALIsM-HF study is to evaluate the longitudinal daily activity profiles of patients with HF and correlate these with changes in serum/plasma biomarker profiles, symptoms, quality of life, and cardiac function and morphology to inform the use of wearable activity monitors for developing novel therapies and managing patients.

Incremental prognostic value of a novel metabolite-based biomarker score in congestive heart failure patients.

AIMS: The Cardiac Lipid Panel (CLP) is a newly discovered panel of metabolite-based biomarkers that has shown to improve the diagnostic value of N terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). However, little is known about its usefulness in predicting outcomes. In this study, we developed a risk score for 4-year cardiovascular death in elderly chronic heart failure (CHF) patients using the CLP. METHODS AND RESULTS: From the Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study in Elderly trial, we included 280 patients with CHF aged >65 years. A targeted metabolomic analysis of the CLP biomarkers was performed on baseline serum samples. Cox regression was used to determine the association of the biomarkers with the outcome after accounting for established risk factors. A risk score ranging from 0 to 4 was calculated by counting the number of biomarkers above the cut-offs, using Youden index. During the mean (standard deviation) follow-up period of 50 (8) months, 35 (18%) subjects met the primary endpoint of cardiovascular death. The area under the receiver operating curve for the model based on clinical variables was 0.84, the second model with NT-proBNP was 0.86, and the final model with the CLP was 0.90. The categorical net reclassification index was 0.25 using three risk categories: 0-60% (low), 60-85% (intermediate), and >85% (high). The continuous net reclassification index was 0.772, and the integrated discrimination index was 0.104. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CHF, incorporating a panel of three metabolite-based biomarkers into a risk score improved the prognostic utility of NT-proBNP by predicting long-term cardiovascular death more precisely. This novel approach holds promise to improve clinical risk assessment in CHF patients.

Variability of Myocardial Strain During Isometric Exercise in Subjects With and Without Heart Failure.

Background: Fast strain-encoded cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI, fast-SENC) is a novel technology potentially improving characterization of heart failure (HF) patients by quantifying cardiac strain. We sought to describe the impact of isometric handgrip exercise (HG) on cardiac strain assessed by fast-SENC in HF patients and controls. Methods: Patients with stable HF and controls were examined using cMRI at rest and during HG. Left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) and global circumferential (GCS) were derived from image analysis software using fast-SENC. Strain change < -0.5 and > +0.5 was classified as increase and decrease, respectively. Results: The study population comprised 72 subjects, including HF with reduced, mid-range and preserved ejection fraction and controls (HFrEF n = 18 HFmrEF n = 18, HFpEF n = 17, controls: n = 19). In controls, LV GLS remained stable in 36.8%, increased in 36.8% and decreased in 26.3% of subjects during HG. In HF subgroups, similar patterns of LV GLS response were observed (HFpEF: stable 41.2%, increase 35.3%, decrease: 23.5%; HFmrEF: stable 50.0%, increase 16.7%, decrease: 33.3%; HFrEF: stable 33.3%, increase 22.2%, decrease: 44.4%, p = 0.668). Mean change between LV GLS at rest and during HG ranged close to zero with broad standard deviation in all subgroups and was not significantly different between subgroups (+1.2 ± 5.4%, -0.6 ± 8.3%, -1.7 ± 10.7%, and -3.1 ± 19.4%, p = 0.746 in controls, HFpEF, HFmrEF and HFrEF, respectively). However, the absolute value of LV GLS change-irrespective of increase or decrease-was significantly different between subgroups with 4.4 ± 3.2% in controls, 5.9 ± 5.7% in HFpEF, 6.8 ± 8.3% in HFmrEF and 14.1 ± 13.3% in HFrEF (p = 0.005). The absolute value of LV GLS change significantly correlated with resting LVEF, NTproBNP and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire scores. Conclusion: The response to isometric exercise in LV GLS is heterogeneous in all HF subgroups and in controls. The absolute value of LV GLS change during HG exercise is elevated in HF patients and associated with measures of HF severity. The diagnostic utility of fast-SENC strain assessment in conjunction with HG appears to be limited. Trial Registration: URL: https://www.drks.de; Unique Identifier: DRKS00015615.